Underwriter · Overview

Book health & discount banding

Risk banding, tier movement and the discount liability that follows it. Trends here answer one question: is the book getting healthier fast enough to justify the discounts.

Enrolled
400
Flat vs 90d ago
120 with daily data
Sharing data
66%
+3 pts vs 90d
Peak Consistency
32%
−0.2 pts vs prior 28d
Fitness Age Gap
+1.2
yrs
No prior period
Net migration
−1
17 up · 18 down
Liability
Modelled
$32k
/ yr
−3.7% vs 2026-Q2

Trends

2026-Q2 vs 2026-Q3 · daily data runs 2026-03-27 → 2026-09-22

Book health trajectory
Peak Consistency fell 0.2 pts
Which segments are improving
Priority moved the most: +0 avg tier
2026-Q22026-Q3
What the programme costs
Liability fell $1,223 a year
Modelled

Insights

LiabilityModelled
Liability fell $1,223 a year on net migration of -1

Discount spend follows tier movement one-for-one. Set against it the persistency gap on the Engagement screen: engaged members lapse less, which is where the discount is recovered.

Gate risk
26 members are trending below the gate before period close

Missing the gate makes a member Unrated, which removes their discount without any change in health. A wear reminder before quarter close is the cheapest retention action available.

Path split
65% of upgrades were earned on the improvement path

Above the 40% low-water mark: members are qualifying by getting healthier, not only by already being healthy.

By segment

Rows below the minimum cell size are suppressed, never rounded.

SegmentEnrolledSharingPeak ConsistencyFitness Age GapNet migration
3.2
Priority
avg tier 3.2
26359%
32%
+1.3 yrs→ Steady
2.9
Priority Private
avg tier 2.9
10580%
28%
+1.1 yrs▲ Improving +1
3.2
Private Banking
avg tier 3.2
3278%Suppressed · 9 monitored, minimum 10